If you are a law aspirant, then, you must remember the date 24 April, 1973 not only for the birthdate of Sachin Tendulkar but also
Tag: #case analysis
case summary : DM ARAVALLI GOLF CLUB and; Ors. Vs. CHANDER HASS and; Ors.
FACTS: In the year 1988, Haryana Tourism Corporation, hereinafter referred to as appellants appointed the respondents as a Gardener in the golf club on daily
critical analysis: eating socio-economic rights
This article compares the socio-economic rights of South Africa to the author’s perspective as to how these rights defeats the current condition of the social
S. R. Bommai v. Union of India and Some Instances of President’s rule on States
Majority of the times article 356 is misused, until the landmark judgment of S. R. Bommai v. Union of India[1]. This case put an end
united states vs. cardova
UNITED STATES VS CORDOVA, 1950 (CASE STUDY) United States District Court E.D. New York, NO- CR 42082. J. Vincent Keogah , United States
BHOPAL GAS TRAGEDY
Bhopal is known for its historical records, man-made lakes, and greenery, but it is best known as the location of the world’s worst industrial tragedy.
R v Dudley and Stephens, 1884
R v Dudley and Stephens (1884) is a landmark English criminal case that established the principle that necessity is not a defence to a murder
Case Study of – Abne Ingty v. CPIO, Delhi University, New Delhi
In the case of Abne Ingty v. CPIO, Delhi University, New Delhi the appellant sought relief against the unreasonable large sum of fee (INR 750/-)
Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co, 1893
A succinct summary of the facts. After seeing Defendant’s advertising claiming that its product might prevent influenza, Plaintiff purchased a Carbolic Smoke Ball and followed
Entick v Carrington, 1765
Entick v Carrington [1765] is a landmark decision in English and UK constitutional law that established individual civil rights and limited governmental authority. The case
SUPREME COURT JUDGMENT ON FUTURE RETAIL VS. AMAZON – AN ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION In a recent judgment, a two-judge bench of the Supreme Court upheld the judgment of the Singapore International Arbitration Centre which had stayed the
Fagan v Metropolitan Police Commissioner, 1969
A policeman told the defendant to park his vehicle near the curb. He continued driving his vehicle right up to the constable’s foot. ‘Get off,
R v R, 1991
The House of Lords decided in R v R [1991] that it is illegal for a husband to rape his wife under English criminal law.
Case Summary: Chinnaya vs. Rammaya
Court: Madras High Court Full Case Name: Chinnaya V. Rammaya (1882) Date Decided: 21st October 1987 Judges: Innes J, Kindersley J Appellant: Venkata Chinnaya Respondent: Venkata RamayyaGaru Facts
CASE STUDY- D.N JEEVARAJU and ANR Vs D. SUDHAKAR & ORS
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION – SLP ( C ) NOs 33333-33335 COURT – THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA BENCH – J. Altamash Kabir, J. Cyriac Joseph HELD ON – 16/12/2010 PARTIES INVOLVED – D. N Jeevaraju & Anr ( Petitioner) D. Sudhakar & Ors (Respondent) BRIEF FACTS OF THE
CORPORATION OF CITY OF GLASGOW V. TAYLOR- CASE STUDY
CORPORATION OF CITY OF GLASGOW V. TAYLOR- CASE STUDY This case is based on the tort of negligence, wherein due to the negligence by
Hunooman Prasad Pandey vs. Muss Badooi moonraj Kanwar [(1856) 6 MIA 393]
Introduction: This case is related to rights of alienation of the property of minor by ‘karta’ or ‘manger’. The main points for consideration before the
ARNESH KUMAR Vs STATE OF BIHAr and ANR
Arnesh Kumar vs State Of Bihar & Anr Bench- Chandramauli Kr. Prasad, Pinaki Chandra Ghose Arnesh Kumar v. the State of Bihar is a landmark judgment, which was pronounced by the Apex Court
Analysis of subramanian swamy vs union of india
This case is known as one of the most significant free speech cases till date because it was the first time that the Supreme Court
ANALYSIS OF BALFOUR VS BALFOUR
FACTS OF THE CASE: The complainant in the case in discussion is Mr. Balfour who lived in Ceylon, Sri Lanka with his wife. His wife
