The issue of women regarding reservation is a very ignorant topic, and people tend to ignore such topics when it comes to women’s rights as equal to men. Women’s issue in India has gained prominence for several reasons. Sociologists report that violence against women has increased ever since they have started stepping out of their traditional roles as housemakers. In essence, the more they try to fit in a public place, the more violence they are likely to face.

Before we can kickstart the discussion on why we should have women’s reservations, we should comprehend the reason why we don’t. The Constituent Assembly initially contained 389 individuals, out of which just 15 were women. An investigation of the Constituent Assembly Debates illuminates the way that the issue of women’s reservation was brought up in the Assembly yet was dismissed for different reasons.

To begin with, the Constituent Assembly lacked female support for it. Women were horribly underrepresented, as is apparent by the numbers, and they neglected to join for the purpose and assemble agreement. While some were reluctant to request reservations for reasons examined in the following passage, some unequivocally went against the interest. One of the individuals, Mrs. Renuka Ray, contended against it as she thought it was an “obstacle to our development and an affront to our actual insight and limit.” She accepted that in a free India, women would be assessed on conditions of capacity alone and would not be in any need of reservation, referring to the case of Ms. Vijaylaxmi Pandit and Sarojini Naidu, neglecting to acknowledge they were the exemption rather than the standard, and unfit to expect the organized sexism and discrimination that women would keep on confronting which act as obstacles to female success.

A few male individuals appear to be directed by the gender ideas of their times, which either didn’t consider women to be adequately skilled to stand firm on footholds in the public authority, or they were viewed as a danger to men and the ethical structure holding the system together, as confirmed by the addresses of HV Kamath (“women is governed more by the heart than by the head”) and Loknath Misra (“assuming if women guarantee opportunity and fairness… with men… there will be an end of our civilization”), caught in the Constituent Assembly Debates. There were some that likewise accepted the arrangements in the Constitution were satisfactory to inspire women from their quandary. They likewise emphasized that men would guarantee women government assistance, subsequently minimizing the requirement for reservations. Indeed, even a staunch supporter of women’s strengthening like Dr. BR Ambedkar didn’t demand women’s reservation.

After seventy years or more, these reasons are not any more convincing, as they were in those days. Women are far from being in a position to “elbow” men out. Capacity has seldom been the deciding component for winning decisions, and in spite of women’s demonstrating their abilities in each field, they keep on excess underrepresented. Two significant purposes behind this are examined here.

Cash and muscle power have customarily assumed an indispensable part in getting appointive triumphs. Women charge inadequately in the two divisions, given that the monetary strengthening of women in India is currently at a beginning stage and is in peril, with female labor force interest tumbling to 23.3%. Just 14% of women in the agrarian area own the homesteads they work on, and a greater part of the property in India is as yet in possession of men. Women additionally think that it is more diligently to get muscle power as they have customarily been related with homegrown jobs and not with places of political administration, making it a troublesome assignment to break out of the form. The developing peculiarity of criminalization of legislative issues further goes about as an obstacle for women, for in addition to the fact that they lack impact and involvement with this male-ruled circle, they are frequently at the less than desirable finish of a large number of these wrongdoings.

Bibliography: –

  1. Singh A, ‘Let’s Talk Women’S Reservation’ (DNA India, 2019) <; accessed 7 January 2022
  2. ‘Women’S Reservation Bill’ (Drishti IAS, 2021) <; accessed 7 January 2022
  3. MUKHERJEE J, and LAHA R, ‘Reservation Won’T Boost Women Participation In The Workforce’ (, 2018) <; accessed 7 January 2022

Aishwarya Says:

I have always been against Glorifying Over Work and therefore, in the year 2021, I have decided to launch this campaign “Balancing Life”and talk about this wrong practice, that we have been following since last few years. I will be talking to and interviewing around 1 lakh people in the coming 2021 and publish their interview regarding their opinion on glamourising Over Work.

If you are interested in participating in the same, do let me know.

Do follow me on FacebookTwitter  Youtube and Instagram.

The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.

If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems at

In the year 2021, we wrote about 1000 Inspirational Women In India, in the year 2022, we would be featuring 5000 Start Up Stories.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.