Justice Ayesha A. Malik of the Lahore High Court is set to turn into the main lady Supreme Court judge in Pakistan. Her height has been endorsed by the JCP. The Judicial Commission of Pakistan has prepared for Justice Ayesha Malik of the Lahore High Court to be raised as the country's first lady Supreme Court judge.


  • Justice Malik’s name will presently be taken up by a parliamentary advisory group.
  • Whenever raised, Justice Malik will serve on Pakistan’s Supreme Court until June 2031.
  • Pakistan Bar Council had taken steps to blacklist courts assuming that JPC demonstrated Justice Malik’s innocence.

Justice Ayesha A Malik of the Lahore High Court is set to turn into the primary lady Supreme Court judge in Pakistan. The Judicial Commission of Pakistan on Thursday gave its gesture to the Supreme Court for the height of Ayesha Malik from High Court to Supreme Court, Dawn announced. The choice was taken during the JCP meeting led by the Chief Justice of Pakistan, Gulzar Ahmed. The rise of Justice Ayesha Malik was endorsed by a greater part of five votes against four during the gathering, Dawn detailed, refering to a source. To settle on the height of Justice Ayesha Malik, the JCP met for the second time subsequent to meeting on Malik’s rise on September 9. In the gathering that was held last year, four individuals from the eight-part Judicial Commission of Pakistan had contradicted the proposition of hoisting Justice Malik.In the gathering, Justice Malik’s height was endorsed by a greater part of five votes against four. Equity Ayesha Malik would have turned into a Supreme Court judge last year itself however an absence of agreement in the JCP meeting in September saw her height getting dismissed.
Pakistan is set to get its first lady Supreme Court judge – Justice Ayesha Malik of the Lahore High Court. The Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) headed by Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed on Thursday supported the rise of Justice Ayesha Malik by a greater part of five votes against four, detailed Dawn. It is essential to take note of that this was the second time the JCP held a gathering to settle on Justice Ayesha Malik’s height. Her name was first taken up for conversation on September 9 last year yet later dismissed inferable from a tie of four votes against four. Abdul Latif Afridi, leader of Pakistan’s Supreme Court Bar Association, had even required a countrywide dissent against her name being thought of. Equity Malik is junior to many appointed authorities serving in the country’s five high courts, Afridi had told the media. On Thursday, the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) had taken steps to blacklist the courts assuming the JPC demonstrated Justice Ayesha Malik’s innocence for rise. Be that as it may, the Judicial Commission of Pakistan’s proposal will currently be considered by a parliamentary advisory group. By and large, this panel agrees with the JCP’s proposal, which implies that Justice Ayesha Malik is currently one bit nearer to turning into Pakistan’s first lady Supreme Court judge. The Supreme Court Bar Association had communicated reservations at her selection because of the issue of status. President Abdul Latif Afridi had called out to a countrywide dissent against her being thought of, saying that she was junior to many appointed authorities serving in five high courts of the country. This time the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) had taken steps to blacklist courts on the off chance that the JCP went on to think of her as name. The PCB is relied upon to unsettle against her underwriting. Equity Malik turned into a high court judge in March 2012 and as of now she is number four on the Lahore High Court (LHC) judge rank rundown. In the event of her rise, she will fill in as a Supreme Court judge until June 2031 preceding resigning at 65 years old.


Ayesha A. Malik (conceived 3 June 1966) has been a Judge of the Lahore High Court in Pakistan since 27 March 2012.She holds Pakistani Nationality yet spent numerous long periods of her life abroad. On January 06, 2021, Judicial Commission of Pakistan supported her to turn out to be very first female adjudicator of Supreme Court of Pakistan. Ayesha Malik is a female Pakistani adjudicator who is serving in Lahore High Court beginning around 2012. She accepted her Law schooling degree from Harward law school and began rehearsing in the last part of the 1990s. In the beginning, she worked with a Pakistani legal counselor Mr. Fakhurddin G. Ebrahim, and got insight. Aside from this, she likewise showed law at the University of Punjab.She is additionally a social laborer who is joined to different NGOs. She has involved herself in numerous destitution programs. Other than this, she has likewise composed different distributions. On twelfth August 2021, she made one more accomplishment by being the principal Pakistani female to be assigned as Supreme Court Judge. Equity Ayesha otherwise called Ayesha A. Malik is a bold Pakistani female appointed authority who began her administrations in the last part of the 1990s and made new records and history with her persistent effort and assurance. She did her tutoring and law schooling abroad and got back to Pakistan to serve her country. She stayed fastened with Mr. Fakhurddin G. Ebrahim and Isa, Rizvi, and Afridi in her underlying years. She additionally filled in as a leader of Women passes judgment on assurance that was the recently made council around then. Moreover, she has a considerable rundown of social administrations that she continued to do all through her vocation. Ayesha Malik is a living model for youngsters who seek to follow their enthusiasm and dreams at any expense. She accepted her initial tutoring from New York and Paris. Afterward, she went to Francis Holland School London to get her A-levels degree. Subsequently, she moved to Pakistan and did her lone ranger’s in Government College of Commerce. In the beginning, she accepted her law instruction from Lahore, yet for LLM, she went to Harvard University. Ayesha is hitched and favored with 3 kids. Subsequent to finishing her schooling, she returned to Pakistan and began her vocation with the help of Mr. Fakhurddin G. Ebrahim in Karachi. She remained related with a Pakistani adjudicator, Mr. Fakhurddin G. Ebrahim, from 1997 to 2001. Afterward, she joined herself with Rizvi, Isa, Afridi and Angell and filled in as a senior partner from 2001 to 2004. She stayed a join forces with them and held charge of the company’s office held in Lahore. After her enormous difficult work, she turned into the appointed authority of Lahore High Court in 2012. She will be resigned from this post in 2028. While being on the seat, she made many noted accomplishments. A council for the Protection of Women Judges in 2019 was held for which Ayesha Malik was made the president. The central equity of LHC began the advisory group. Equity Ayesha Malik is joined to The International Association of Women Judges, where the freedoms of ladies and young ladies are ensured. Moreover, she is a defender of each sexual orientation’s point of view. She shows up in District Court, High Court, Special Tribunals, Banking Court and so forth She has been associated with different cases rotating around divorces, Children authority, common freedoms in Australia and England. The Lahore High Court judge, Ayesha Malik, is designated for the Supreme Court judge post by Chief Justice Gulzar Ahmed, and assuming things work out positively, she will be the primary female in history to be named as a Supreme Court Judge. This news via online media fulfilled everybody, and she began getting a great deal of celebratory and all the best messages. Equity Ayesha Malik has been in various social works for the duration of her life. She did a great deal for destitution with various NGOs and showed distinctive relational abilities and English language projects to SOS Village understudies. Other than being an appointed authority and social laborer, she is additionally an essayist and composed different distributions previously. A couple of her distributions were distributed in the Oxford college press.


There has been one change in the arrangement of the JCP since its last gathering: Retired Justice Dost Muhammad’s residency as a part was finished on October 10, 2021, and he was supplanted by Retired Justice Sarmad Jalal Osmany. In the present gathering, the new part concurred with the CJP’s assignment and casted a ballot for Justice Malik’s arrangement. who is additionally an individual from the JCP, has composed a two-page letter to all individuals asking them to set measures for the arrangement of SC judges. The equity addressed Rule 3 of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan Rules, 2010. The standard sets out the cycle for legal selections makes no notice of the words ‘senior-most’ judge’ for the arrangement and awards optional capacity to the Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) to start the name of high court judge for arrangement to the SC and high courts. The January 6 meeting of the JCP was gathered after the CJP by and by proposed the name of Justice Ayesha A Malik for height. On September 9, an absence of agreement constrained the commission to concede the arrangement of Justice Malik to enter the Supreme Court as the very first lady judge in the country’s legal history.
In his letter, equity Isa alluded to Article 175-An of the Constitution which doesn’t allow CJP to work out ‘unbound optional ability’ to name high court decided for the zenith court. During the last gathering, Justice Maqbool Baqar – another JCP part – additionally asked the commission individuals to advance rules first prior to starting the name of Justice Ayesha Malik. The sources additionally uncovered that the issue for rebuilding the interaction and setting rules would be raised by Attorney General for Pakistan Khalid Jawed during the JCP’s gathering booked to be hung on January 6. The AGP had effectively composed a letter to unrivaled bars for this reason.
As indicated by the AGP, various variables are thought about for the exhibition assessment of high court judges, some of which might not really settled based on accessible information while different elements would be educated by broad assessment and discernment. “These could incorporate standing and public discernment about honesty, freedom and fairness, medical issue, length of administration, number of cases heard and decisions conveyed, number of cases heard yet decisions not conveyed, normal term between definite hearing and conveyance of judgment, obligation to established qualities and essential privileges, reach and variety of work, skill in a specific region, control over language, disposition and attitude towards associates, the bar and the defendants and so forth,” he added. “Being a delegate of the lawful society in your separate limit … you are mentioned to pass on the perspectives on the legitimate clique regarding this matter.”
It is likewise discovered that previous Sindh High Court Bar Association president Salahuddin Ahmed will give a white paper on passes judgment on arrangements. He has effectively moved a protected appeal with a petition that Rule 3 of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan Rules, 2010 in regards to optional powers of Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) might be saved, the course of arrangement of judges to unrivaled legal executive be rebuilt and height of judges from high courts to the peak court be made by holding fast to the guideline of status for smooth working of the legal executive in light of a legitimate concern for equity. JCP is liable for the arrangement of judges to the Supreme Court and five high courts of the country. The CJP likewise heads the commission as its director. The body likewise contains four senior-most adjudicators of the Supreme Court, a previous appointed authority, the government law serve, the head legal officer for Pakistan and a senior supporter selected by the Pakistan Bar Council. The common and Islamabad bar boards each assign an agent as a JCP part. Last year, unrivaled bars arranged a dissent and boycotted Supreme Court procedures on the event of the JCP meeting to consider the designation of Lahore High Court’s Justice Ayesha Malik for her arrangement as a SC judge. Peruse JCP requested to designate females as prevalent courts’ adjudicators Later, CJP Gulzar in his discourse just before the new legal year said the dissent coordinated by the legal advisors’ local area on September 9 against the arrangement of junior appointed authorities to the SC was “inappropriate”. The CJP said despite the fact that he was “consistently” prepared to meet the delegates of the attorneys’ local area for a neighborly answer for their concerns, this time nobody had moved toward him for the arrangement of judges. Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Bar Council agent Ahmed Farooq in the JCP composed a letter to the CJP to acknowledge his greeting for exchange. Afterward, the agents of better bars were welcomed than meet the CJP on October 20. During the gathering, the main equity had consented to inform a council of JCP individuals to consider the better bars’ recommendations for revisions than the commission’s principles. It is discovered that the CJP may bring a full house meeting of the commission to examine the proposed changes to the JCP Rules 2010. Notwithstanding, nothing was done in such manner. The PBC has proposed various changes to the JCP rules, calling for moving optional powers on the arrangement of better court decided from the executive than the commission.


Responding to the debate encompassing the assignment of Lahore High Court Justice Ayesha A. Malik to the summit court, female legal counselors’ gathering Women in Law Pakistan has given an assertion dissipating the different ‘legends and mistaken assumptions’ with respect to the arrangement of judges to the Supreme Court. On the subject of status, an essential issue of dispute in Justice Malik’s assignment, the drive clarifies that, “something like multiple times judges have been designated to the Supreme Court without them being generally senior. There is, along these lines, no such custom all things considered. ‘Rank’, is, best case scenario, a simple interest of certain individuals from the Bars right now and has no legitimate premise.” “Nonattendance of the words ‘the most senior’ in Article 177 for arrangement of Judges of the SC [Supreme Court] shows that position of a Judge in the High Court is definitely not a fundamental condition for their arrangement as a Judge of the SC,” the gathering noted. “There are no turns and nobody has any privilege to be arrangement based on status,” the gathering certified. Equity Malik would be fourth in the rank rundown of the great court. Sent off in 2016, Women in Law Pakistan “works for uniformity of chance and network of female legal advisors in Pakistan.” The selection of Justice Malik to the top court has partitioned the lawful local area. The principal vote in regards to her arrangement in September brought about a gridlock, with four JCP individuals casting a ballot in favor and the leftover democratic against. The Judicial Commission of Pakistan (JCP) is booked to hold a meeting to think about Justice Malik’s arrangement to the Supreme Court tomorrow, January 6. The Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) has taken steps to blacklist all court procedures on the off chance that the consultation is held. PBC Vice-Chairman Khushdil Khan said in an explanation that the gathering would totally blacklist the courts on Thursday. He kept up with that the PBC didn’t generally disapprove of a lady’s arrangement to the SC, however contended that status ought to be considered.
The Chairman additionally repeated an assertion from Chief Justice Pakistan (CJP) Gulzar Ahmed relating that new adjudicators ought to be designated by the approaching top appointed authority. The CJP had proposed the arrangement of Justice Malik to the SC for the subsequent time the month before. The primary decision on Justice Malik was held in September, bringing about a gridlock in which four individuals from the JCP went against her arrangement and the excess four were in favor. Equity Maqbool Baqar, Justice Sardar Tariq Masood, previous adjudicator Dost Mohammad Khan and a delegate of the PBC, Akhtar Hussain, had gone against her arrangement. The CJP, Justice Umar Ata Bandial, Federal Law Minister Barrister Dr Farogh Naseem and Attorney General (AGP) Khalid Jawed Khan decided for her arrangement to the pinnacle court. On December 24, 2020, it was declared that Chief Justice of Pakistan Gulzar Ahmed had again proposed the assignment of Justice Ayesha Malik to be designated as a Justice of the Supreme Court. While most female attorneys and a few male associates invited this assignment, that very day the VC of Pakistan Bar Council, Khush Dil Khan gave an official statement communicating his ‘genuine reservations’ with respect to ‘infringement’ of ‘position standard’ for ‘rise’ of judges. He followed it up by repeating how position was a ‘predictable’ position of the legitimate crew and finished on an undermining note that any endeavor to disregard the status guideline will be opposed with ‘full power and enthusiasm’ by the lawful society. But in any case, there is no such status standard as asserted by the VC and his comrades. Until further notice, in spite of what is asserted, it is just an interest of a portion of the Bars and its individuals rather than that of the whole legitimate organization and thusly, a bogus and erroneous promotion is being made as though to show that an infringement of some hallowed guideline has happened – when no such standard exists in any case.

There is in this way, learned contemptibility in demanding a nonexistent rule when none exists and to attempt to make it look like a hallowed rule of sorts which it isn’t is simply erroneous. To undermine unsettling for not executing what doesn’t exist is much more silly. Allow us to trust that a particular perspective on the VC of Pakistan Bar Council isn’t decisively the perspective on the body in general. Anyway, where does this disarray emerge and what precisely does the law and constitution say about this? The legal arrangements process has been the subject of much discussion and discussion both earlier and post the eighteenth and nineteenth amendment of the Constitution. Preceding eighteenth amendment, the greatest concern connected with need for legal freedom from the chief. Nonetheless, the arrangement conceived in the result of the devolution wound up concentrating the force of starting selections for legal arrangements in the possession of the Chief Justice, to be settled with agreement of the individuals from the Judicial Commission of Pakistan and a formal gesture of the Parliamentary Committee. This left the cycle corrupted with charges of assertion and absence of straightforwardness that again prompted sabotaging of public certainty, particularly of the individuals from the lawful club in the legal executive, who reacted with what to their psyche appears to be a more certain and less political course of arrangement of judges – for example based on position.

They request this in a bid to control the current right of the Chief Justice to ‘single out’ the candidates for such arrangements with the expectation that this would guarantee that there was no bias or ‘amiss’ arrangements to comprise the summit seat of their deepest longing for political increases. They additionally call for more prominent common portrayal in the summit court and demand rank being applied as an interval measure until standards and cycles that can guarantee such portrayal are settled upon. Everything except the discretionary force of the Chief to start selections that is. However, while it is actually the case that the current course of legal assignments really does truth be told should be changed and made more straightforward and organized, the interest for position being applied even in break is not really the ideal arrangement they think it is.

Consider: Article 175-A read along with A 177 of the Constitution and rule 3 of the Judicial Commission of Pakistan Rules 2010 that sets out the current interaction for legal selections makes no notice of the words ‘senior most adjudicator’ for arrangement in its language other than that for the Chief of a given court. This position is likewise upheld by a pre eighteenth amendment case, the 1996 Al Jehad Trust Case additionally generally known as the Judges’ case and again in 2002 in Supreme Court Bar Association v Federation of Pakistan in which it was held that status was a necessity just for arrangement of the Chief of any court and not for designating some other adjudicator of the court.

In their view, the consultative interaction conceived in the constitution for designation and arrangements of unrivaled adjudicators will become excess and unnecessary assuming the standard of position is held pertinent to the arrangement of the Judges of the Supreme Court on the grounds that in that possibility the cycle would become programmed and mechanical. As such, what might be the requirement for having a Judicial Commission of Pakistan on the off chance that a transport line procedure for ‘raising’ judges is to be taken on? This carries me to the subsequent point. Frequently the word ‘arrangement’ is utilized conversely with the word ‘height’ which makes the confusion as though they are very much the same thing. Because of this conflation, you would regularly hear lawful ‘club’ talk regarding how ‘rank’ was being ‘disregarded’ or ‘neglected’ or you might have heard them talk about an ‘amiss’ arrangement as though there is right of section dependent on age and experience.

This conflation prompts the disarray that rise involves just subsequent to arriving at a specific age when truth be told this isn’t true. Not exclusively does the constitution not notice that the senior most adjudicator should be considered for arrangement, the adjudicators in 2002 completely expressed that arrangements to the Supreme Court are viewed as new arrangements rather than heights. In this way, it is wrong to acknowledge the story that the ‘status rule’ has not been ‘kept’ or has been ‘disregarded’. How might something be ignored when it isn’t so much as a prerequisite under the law or constitution? Moreover, it is additionally inaccurate to pitch one adjudicator against the other by talking as far as ‘amiss’ arrangements on the grounds that there are no turns. Every assignment ought to be seen based on the strength of every individual up-and-comer rather than being ‘finished’ or corresponding to some other adjudicator. This is on the grounds that, the law even as it at present stands, does conceive scope for attorneys with more than fifteen years of training to be considered for selection straightforwardly as an adjudicator of the Supreme Court without having truly being designated as an appointed authority at any level, so it truly isn’t an issue of choosing one over the other yet more an issue of accepting every individual assignment as a different and particular case as any other way, for what reason would the law put a legal advisor who has never been an adjudicator, not to mention that of High Court to be in the comparative place of having the chance of being named as an adjudicator of the Supreme Court?

In addition, it is vital to be aware of the way that whenever rank is settled in as a rule even meanwhile, then, at that point, a right will have been made of the senior most adjudicator to be ‘raised’ and there will be no returning from it towards more comprehensive changes that can guarantee genuine portrayal of underrepresented bunches in the peak court which is the thing that one of the fundamental requests of the bar truly is. In this way, assuming portrayal is the real ultimate objective, it’s a horrible idea to settle in rank even in the meantime since status doesn’t and can’t ensure portrayal. The advancing worldwide guidelines and standards currently favor a more legitimacy based, variety engaged and open arrangement of legal arrangements instead of one that is stuck absolutely on rank the world over, regardless of whether you check out the Latimer house standards, or the changes in the UK in state of Judicial Appointments Commission in 2005, the drives embraced by Ontario and other province nations. In Pakistan nonetheless, until such time that we remain focused with frontier ideas like position and keep tying the honor, regard and spirit of a senior adjudicator with saw qualification for rise, no genuine exchange or changes towards more noteworthy portrayal will result. Consequently, one requirements to quit viewing at these designations as a rivalry between one adjudicator over the other and on second thought embrace tolerating merit as a reason for arrangements in predominant court.

Image Source: India Today

Aishwarya Says:

I have always been against Glorifying Over Work and therefore, in the year 2021, I have decided to launch this campaign “Balancing Life”and talk about this wrong practice, that we have been following since last few years. I will be talking to and interviewing around 1 lakh people in the coming 2021 and publish their interview regarding their opinion on glamourising Over Work.

If you are interested in participating in the same, do let me know.

Do follow me on FacebookTwitter  Youtube and Instagram.

The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.

If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems at

In the year 2021, we wrote about 1000 Inspirational Women In India, in the year 2022, we would be featuring 5000 Start Up Stories.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.