COMPETITION LAW IN INDIA

Many countries have enacted their own competition laws in order to prevent anti-competitive behavior and unfair trade practices. The competition law is primarily concerned with preventing specific market activities that harm businesses, customers, or both, as well as curbing market behaviors that violate market ethics.

The Competition Act, 2002 was created in India to maintain the long-term viability of market competition while also taking into account the interests of consumers and allowing market participants to trade freely. This rule encourages entrepreneurial competition and removes the market’s shackles from the manipulation of larger trading firms.

The main objectives of the act:

  • To prevent practices having adverse effect on competition
  • To promote and sustain competition in markets
  • To protect the interests of consumers
  • To ensure freedom of trade

ANTI-COMPETITIVE AGREEMENTS

Anti-Competitive Agreements are classified mainly into two types:

  • Horizontal Agreements, Section 3(3) – cartel, bid-rigging etc.: between two or more enterprises operating at same level of business.
  • Vertical Agreements, Section 3(4) – exclusive supply/distribution, tie-in arrangement, Resale price maintenance, refusal to deal etc.

HORIZONTAL AGREEMENTS

  1. Setting the price of a purchase or a transaction, either directly or indirectly.
  2. Limit or regulate production, supply, market, technological progress, investment, or service provision.
  3. The market is divided into shares based on geographical location.
  4. Bid rigging.
  5. Horizontal Agreements are subject to the ‘shall presume’ rule.
  6. The person or business bears the burden of evidence.
  7. Penalty: Up to three times the contravening enterprise’s profit for each year of the agreement’s continuation, or 10% of its average turnover, whichever is greater.

CASE STUDY

Case No. 29/2010 (CCI order dated June 20, 2012 was remanded back to CCI due to a violation of natural justice principles by COMPAT order dated December 11, 2015): The Cement Manufacturers Association (CMA) and 11 cement manufacturers were found to have formed a cartel, regulated prices and limiting cement output and supply. The informant was the Indian Builders’ Association. The CCI’s rulings of 20.06.2012 and 31.08.2016, which levied a penalty of over Rs. 6,714 crores, are currently pending before the NCLAT.

VERTICAL AGREEMENTS

Vertical agreements are agreements between different levels of the manufacturing and distribution chain, such as Manufacturer-Dealer, Dealer-Supplier, Wholesaler-Retailer, and so on.

Under the Competition Act, the following agreements are prohibited:

  • Tie-in arrangements
  • Exclusive supply agreement
  • Agreement on exclusive distribution
  • Refusal to make a deal
  • Maintenance of the resale price

CASE STUDY

Honda Siel Cars ltd. vs. Shamsher Kataria (Case No.03/2011). CCI levied a penalty of over Rs.2500 crores on 14 major vehicle manufacturers for violating the Competition Act, 2002, in the first major order issued under section 3(4) of the Act. It was said that all major vehicle manufacturers forbade their spare parts and diagnostic instruments from being sold on the open market, forcing customers to purchase them from their authorised dealers. While passing the detailed order, the CCI relied on several judgements. Some automobile manufacturers have filed writ petitions in various High Courts in an attempt to halt the Commission’s and DG’s activities, but to no avail. On the merits, the Appellate Tribunal upheld the CCI’s decision. The case is currently ongoing in the Supreme Court.

REFERENCES

https://www.cci.gov.in/sites/default/files/presentation_document/TheCompetitonAct2002-Abriefoverview.pdf?download=1

Aishwarya Says:

I have always been against Glorifying Over Work and therefore, in the year 2021, I have decided to launch this campaign “Balancing Life”and talk about this wrong practice, that we have been following since last few years. I will be talking to and interviewing around 1 lakh people in the coming 2021 and publish their interview regarding their opinion on glamourising Over Work.

If you are interested in participating in the same, do let me know.

Do follow me on FacebookTwitter  Youtube and Instagram.

The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.

If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems at adv.aishwaryasandeep@gmail.com

We also have a Facebook Group Restarter Moms for Mothers or Women who would like to rejoin their careers post a career break or women who are enterpreneurs.

We are also running a series Inspirational Women from January 2021 to March 31,2021, featuring around 1000 stories about Indian Women, who changed the world. #choosetochallenge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.