In December 2020, the Supreme Court remained the Andhra Pradesh High Court request that tried to gather a suo moto legal investigation into whether there is a “sacred breakdown” in the Andhra Pradesh Government.

This was unmistakably an instance of legal exceed by the A.P. High Court. The subject of a “sacred breakdown” or the disappointment of protected hardware is managed under Article 356 of the Constitution, whose summoning goes under the right of the leader and not the legal executive.

However the Supreme Court has legitimately interceded in a tussle between the legal executive and the chosen government in Andhra Pradesh, the A.P High court’s structure opens up the chance of utilization or even abuse of Article 356 by the legal executive.

Henceforth, there is a requirement for rolling out fundamental improvements to the constitution, in order to stop the abuse of Article 356 and reinforce Indian Federalism in obvious soul.

Article 356: Background

No liberal popularity based Constitution on the planet has an arrangement, for example, an Article 356 that enables the focal government to excuse an equitably chose State government aside from the Constitution of Pakistan.

The two India and Pakistan acquired this arrangement from the Government of India Act, 1935.

The heads of the Indian opportunity battle were so extremely went against to this arrangement that they constrained the British government to suspend it. Segment 93 of the Government of India Act, 1935 was never brought into impact.

In any case, the arrangement which we had gone against during our opportunity battle was joined in the Constitution for the conservation of majority rule government, federalism and strength in the post-free time.

Article 356 And Its Misuse

Despite the fact that B.R. Ambedkar had guaranteed that it would stay a dead letter, Article 356 has been utilized/abused in excess of multiple times.

In practically all cases it was utilized for political contemplations as opposed to any certifiable breakdown of sacred hardware in the States.

Previous Prime Minister Indira Gandhi utilized Article 356 upwards of multiple times, and by and large to eliminate greater part governments on the ground of political steadiness, nonattendance of clear order or withdrawal of help, and so on

In reprisal, the Janata government eliminated nine state Congress governments, when interestingly they framed the public authority in 1977.

Indira Gandhi on her re-visitation of force in 1980, eliminated nine Opposition greater part governments at one go.

Ensuing governments too acted likewise.

Article 356 And Safeguards

The 1994 Supreme Court (S.R. Bommai case) larger part choice, basically, toppled a long practice that the utilization of Article 356 was not actually liable to audit by courts, a principle verbalized in a milestone 1977 case, State of Rajasthan versus Union of India.

The Bommai case decision set out the conditions under which State governments might be excused, and components for that cycle.

In the S.R. Bommai case, a nine-part seat of the Supreme Court interpreted the extent of Article 356, which likewise permits the inconvenience of President’s Rule in the States, with rigid conditions.

These included finding out whether target conditions exist which render it difficult to do administration in the State where the decree has been made and the cycle must be supported by the two Houses of Parliament before thought for legal audit.

Way Forward

Legal executive Restraining Itself: Judiciary ought to understand that Judicial activism might be great as an uncommon exemption however a dissident legal executive is neither useful for the country nor for the legal executive itself.

Calibrating Role of Governor: In request for the smooth working of majority rule government and reinforcing the soul of federalism, it is significant that the lead representative should act reasonably, unbiasedly and productively while practicing his carefulness and individual judgment.

In this specific circumstance, the proposals of the Sarkaria Commission and Punchhi Commission ought to be continued in obvious soul.

For instance, the ‘method for arrangement of lead representatives ought to be plainly set down’ and states of arrangement should likewise be set down and should guarantee a proper residency for the lead representative.

Need for President’s Activism: President under the Indian constitution is limited by the guide and counsel of the Indian Constitution. Nonetheless, the President can utilize its suspensive denial if there should arise an occurrence of malevolent use of Article 356.

For instance, previous president K.R. Narayanan twice returned the bureau’s proposal on October 22, 1997, in regard of the Kalyan Singh government in Uttar Pradesh which had quite recently won the disputable certainty vote and expressing that inconvenience of President’s Rule would be protected indecency.


The invalidation of the A. P High Court request by the Supreme Court will guarantee that such lawful undertakings impinging upon the division of forces in the State are diminished. In any case, to forestall rehashed abuse of Article 356 significant sacred alterations and solid political will is required.

Aishwarya Says:

I have always been against Glorifying Over Work and therefore, in the year 2021, I have decided to launch this campaign “Balancing Life”and talk about this wrong practice, that we have been following since last few years. I will be talking to and interviewing around 1 lakh people in the coming 2021 and publish their interview regarding their opinion on glamourising Over Work.

If you are interested in participating in the same, do let me know.

Do follow me on FacebookTwitter  Youtube and Instagram.

The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.

If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems at

We also have a Facebook Group Restarter Moms for Mothers or Women who would like to rejoin their careers post a career break or women who are enterpreneurs.

We are also running a series Inspirational Women from January 2021 to March 31,2021, featuring around 1000 stories about Indian Women, who changed the world. #choosetochallenge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.