The doctrine of lis pendens is the oldest doctrine and finds its application in the General Law of English. Under this doctrine, judgments on immovable property are considered to be superior to any transfers made by the parties at the time of the litigation. Later in this doctrine it was also equally accepted for better and more general justice. The word lis means action or suit or suit, while the word pendens means pending. Therefore, the term lis pendens primarily suggests a pending claim or pending indictment. The doctrine of lis pendens was clearly demonstrated at the event – “pendente lite nihil innovature”, which states that nothing new should be introduced during the trial. In the case of Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd. v. Sri Nath Singhji Deo, a theater is attached to issuing an announcement to its owner. At the time of attachment, the owner rented the theater to M / s. Supreme General Films Exchange Ltd. It was upheld by the Supreme Court that the agreement was struck by the doctrine of lis pendens.

The principle behind this doctrine is that during the course of any claim against the title of a particular property, no new interest in the property should be created. The creation of a new interest or title is calculated as the transfer of assets. Therefore, the doctrine of lis pendens prohibits the transfer of pending assets. The doctrine is based on the fact that the court’s decision is still pending against those involved in the claim and those who received the title during the trial. The term “pendent lite nihil innovator” is a law based on the requirement for final release and in the state simply that it is not possible to file a successful claim when the separation is valid during the proceedings.


The right enshrined under Article 52 may be used, no doubt, as a sword and a shield. This depends on the following factors- which party is affected, what right or interest should be transferred and how this transfer may affect any party to the lis pendens. It can be used as a shield between the same groups in the next or similar continuation. Anyone wishing to use this doctrine as a sword must first state his right to do so in the event of any dispute arising out of his claim to do so. If the transfer is not avoided by any party involved in the fraudulent or previous activity that may be affected, the transferor may claim that the right to avoid the transfer is lost. In order to claim that the transfer is invalid in terms of Section 52, a person must ensure that it affects the rights of the other party in the application. If the party is challenging the separation on the basis of this doctrine, it must be found that the transfer was made intentionally with the intent to affect or infringe the rights of the defendant or plaintiff.

                    It is alleged that in the case of Rajendra Singh and Santa Singh, the purpose of the protest was to strike a balance between the two parties’ efforts to reduce the Court’s jurisdiction and the court’s decision.

Aishwarya Says:

I have always been against Glorifying Over Work and therefore, in the year 2021, I have decided to launch this campaign “Balancing Life”and talk about this wrong practice, that we have been following since last few years. I will be talking to and interviewing around 1 lakh people in the coming 2021 and publish their interview regarding their opinion on glamourising Over Work.

If you are interested in participating in the same, do let me know.

Do follow me on FacebookTwitter  Youtube and Instagram.

The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.

If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems at

We also have a Facebook Group Restarter Moms for Mothers or Women who would like to rejoin their careers post a career break or women who are enterpreneurs.

We are also running a series Inspirational Women from January 2021 to March 31,2021, featuring around 1000 stories about Indian Women, who changed the world. #choosetochallenge

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.