ADMISSIBILITY OF MAPS AS EVIDENCE IN INTERNATIONAL DISPUTES

INTRODUCTION –

A map is a symbolic representation of selected characteristics of a place, usually drawn on a flat surface.[1] Maps play a pivotal role because they provide us the demographic information. Undoubtedly, maps have a crucial role in geographic studies. But at the same time, maps are also used as evidence in international law.

International laws are a set of rules, agreements and treaties that are binding between  countries. Countries come together to make binding rules that they believe will benefit the citizens. It is an independent system of law existing outside the legal framework of a particular state.[2]

MAPS AND INTERNATIONAL LAW –

Maps are a influential item used as evidence in international law. But, still there are limitations which usually are not considered in depth. Maps are subjective and therefore, also used as political document. International courts, tribunals and international negotiations, consider maps trustworthy. As, maps appear in front and depicts photographic representation.

Ian Brownlie classifies maps as only serving the purpose of proving something, be it proving fact or law.[3]

QUESTION OF FACT –

There are many types of facts a map can prove. They are –

  • Geographic features.
  • Lines on maps help to differentiate the bench of an area.
  • Tells location for natural features & man- made constructions.
  • Water body & water lines are established.

In the Burkina Faso/ Mati frontier dispute case, maps were used as tools to establish these kinds of facts.[4]

Examples-

1. When a border is established by a natural feature, map can evidence where a river runs or mount peak sits, and in return provide evidence for the border.[5]

2. A map that pinpoints are of military activity might suggest an analysis of whether or not the threshold for the use of force has been reached.[6]

The international court of justice has been very reluctant to give value to maps thus view maps as secondary evidence.[7] But in some situations, maps have been regarded as primary and highly significant evidence. A tribunal can also rely on different maps drafted for different purposes for different questions.[8]

QUESTION OF LAW –

Maps are not only used as facts but they also contribute, for question of law. The ICJ specifically held that,  in  determining the delimitation of maritime areas by  treaty  (as  with any  question of treaty application), the Court must first establish whether the agreement is a treaty and only  then  determine  the  content  of  the  treaty.

Thus,  we  can  separate  the  question  of  whether  a  map  is  potentially  evidentiary of  whether  the  agreement  is  legally  binding  from  the  question  of  how  a  map  evidences the meaning of the treaty terms.[9]

Maps can be used to understand legal obligations. Such as –

Firstly, one party could submit a map as a part of its legal conclusion on its

obligations. For example, various states have attached maps to their responses to the projects undertaken  by the International Law Commission (ILC), supporting their conclusions on the content of the law.[10]

Secondly,  a  map  could  be  introduced  to  prove  the vintentions or understandings of the parties in reaching their negotium, for example,  a  secretly  prepared  map that is later exposed might demonstrate that a party desired a particular outcome.[11]

Thirdly, where a map does not create a legal obligation, which will be  discussed in  more  detail in the  sections to follow, the map might still provide assistance in interpreting the treaty terms that are binding.[12]

CONCLUSION –

Therefore, maps have a more broad and deep relationship with international law than it is observed. Maps are used to prove facts, establish legal relations and creating new laws in international laws. Maps can be used as evidence to prove for fact and law.


[1] https://www.nationalgeographic.org/encyclopedia/map/

[2] https://blog.ipleaders.in/international-law-meaning-definitions/

[3] https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321636757_The_Role_of_t

[4] Case Concerning the Frontier Disp. (Burk. Faso/ Mali), 1986 ICJ Reps. 554 (Dec. 22)

[5]https://www.researchgate.net/publication/321636757_The_Role_of_the_Map_in_International_Law

[6] UNSC & UNGA, Letter dated 16 September 1980 from the Permanent Representative of Democratic Kampuchea to the  United  Nations  addressed  to  the  Secretary-General,  UN  Doc.  A/35/459,  S/14175  (Sep.  17,  1980)  (including  a  map  of the  “military situation”, featuring  “hot battle” “field areas” “guerrilla” and “fighting areas”); UNSC & UNGA, Letter dated 30 May  1980 from the  Permanent Representative of Democratic  Kampuchea to the United  nations addressed to the  Secretary-General, UN Doc. A/35/276, S/13973 (June 2, 1980) (including a map of the same)

[7] Eritrea/Ethiopia,  Decision  Regarding  Delimitation  of  Border, para. 3.21 (Eritrea-Ethiopia Boundary Comm’n, Apr. 13,  2002).

[8] Maritime  Delimitation  (Eritrea  and  Yemen),  Phase  1 (Territorial Sovereignty and Scope of the Dispute), Award,  XXI  UNRIAA 209, paras. 363, 367 (Arb. Trib., Oct. 9, 1998).

[9] Maritime Dispute (Peru v Chile), Judgment, 2014 ICJ Reps. __, paras. 48-50 (Jan. 27)

[10] Int’l L. Comm’n,  H. Lauterpacht, Spec.  Rapp., Report,  Law of Treaties, UN  Doc. A/CN.4/63,  II YBINT’L L.COMM’N (1953), UN Doc. A/CN. 4/8ER. A/1953/Add. 1

[11] Dep’t St., Cable No. 1978CAIRO00139_d, paras. 1-2  (Jan. 3, 1978)

[12] Legal Status of E. Greenland, 1933 PCIJ, Ser. A/B, no. 53, at 49

Aishwarya Says:

I have always been against Glorifying Over Work and therefore, in the year 2021, I have decided to launch this campaign “Balancing Life”and talk about this wrong practice, that we have been following since last few years. I will be talking to and interviewing around 1 lakh people in the coming 2021 and publish their interview regarding their opinion on glamourising Over Work.

If you are interested in participating in the same, do let me know.

Do follow me on FacebookTwitter  Youtube and Instagram.

The copyright of this Article belongs exclusively to Ms. Aishwarya Sandeep. Reproduction of the same, without permission will amount to Copyright Infringement. Appropriate Legal Action under the Indian Laws will be taken.

If you would also like to contribute to my website, then do share your articles or poems at adv.aishwaryasandeep@gmail.com

We also have a Facebook Group Restarter Moms for Mothers or Women who would like to rejoin their careers post a career break or women who are enterpreneurs.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.